…Wearable Technology! When I wrote a few days ago about the evolution of wearable technology, I wondered whether a particular need inspired the technology or if it was the rise of the technology that manifested the need. And now I have learned of another use for wearable technology: life-logging.
I have never heard of life-logging, and the fact that I am only now learning about it is a bit of a surprise to me. Though I’m no techie, I don’t live in a cave either. Maybe I’m in denial about my cave dwelling. No matter. But when I read Rachel Metz’s review of 2 life-logging devices in the MIT Technology Review, I learned that certain “data fanatics and academics” have been life-logging since as early as 1994.
This post isn’t so much about the performance or practicality of the devices – basically small wearable cameras. If you want that information I suggest you read Ms. Metz’s review here. This is more about the actual activity of life-logging; As in what is it and why do it? Fortunately for me, Ms. Metz provides the needed background in her review. Life logging is precisely what it sounds like: logging chronologically, in real time, the events which you area a party to that make up your life, and compiling or cataloging the information into an archive. To achieve this, one wears a device clipped to the clothing or around one’s neck that continually records images. Not a video recording, but still shots taken at intervals (like the old school security cameras), I suppose because bandwith and storage isn’t (yet) free so some conservation of data is required. The author reviews two such devices, the Autographer and the Narrative.
That takes care of the “how”, now on to the “why?” In 1998 one of the early adopters, Microsoft researcher Gordon Bell, started to collect as much digital information about his life as he could. His goal? To create a searchable archive of his memories. If you think about it, people have been creating archives of their memories to some extent for a long time already. How many have kept diaries? Or compiled photos of special events into albums – albums which are now replaced by digital photo archives both online and off. Camera phones have become ubiquitous and are now readily at hand to record any daily events whether momentous or mundane. The progression seems logical – from once daily written records, to photographic records of special occasions, to photographic records of many daily events to life-logging: photographic records of all life’s events – compiled into a searchable archive. So we don’t forget.
To me, this describes the process of creating a substitute memory – one that doesn’t forget or distort the way our organic memories do. This is a clinical recording of the data that makes up an individual’s life experiences (assuming narration or dialog could be added). One that will survive once our organic beings cease to exist. And it could readily be imagined that in some future time the use of this technology might become as common as smartphone use has become today and that more and more people will compile such archives. Could or would these archives then be compiled into a super archive – the collected memories of humanity? And if so would that be a good thing?
What effects might this have on us a human beings? Do we even understand what our memories mean to us? It is a fact that our memories of events change over time – some traumantic events we forget altogether. Is there a purpose to this we don’t understand that may be sidestepped by life-logging? I am on the record as being skeptical of new technology, though history has also shown that I eventually adopt and conform. History has also shown that technology often evolves from our servant to become our master; and that if technology can be abused, it will be abused.
So as technology evolves, so do humans evolve. We adapt to new technologies and increasingly assimilate them into our very being. In my opinion, we should tread lightly and thoughtfully.
Cross Posted at Men Out Of Work Blog